<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Little Running Bear - Latest Comments in Thoughts on poker and weight-lifting</title><link>http://littlerunningbear.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://littlerunningbear.disqus.com/thoughts_on_poker_and_weight_lifting/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:55:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts on poker and weight-lifting</title><link>http://littlerunningbear.com/117/thoughts-on-poker-and-weight-lifting/#comment-12879241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;10 minutes of writing tomorrow. I'm going to give it a shot&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonny Sagorin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on poker and weight-lifting</title><link>http://littlerunningbear.com/117/thoughts-on-poker-and-weight-lifting/#comment-9124766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firstly the game of poker is as much about reading your opposition and hiding your emotions as it is about understanding your cards. But secondly the discipline of writing a book about your cards is somewhat less impressive when you realise that every hand is recorded on video in great detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't disagree with the sentiment of the post and I also don't disagree that there is plenty to learn from a book. I stand by the rule that a good poker player is something innate and brought to the surface with practice and not something that can be taught or learned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My two cents on a game I love. &lt;br&gt;    AJS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AJS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:42:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>